OJPHI: Vol. 5
Journal Information
Journal ID (publisher-id): OJPHI
ISSN: 1947-2579
Publisher: University of Illinois at Chicago Library
Article Information
©2013 the author(s)
open-access: This is an Open Access article. Authors own copyright of their articles appearing in the Online Journal of Public Health Informatics. Readers may copy articles without permission of the copyright owner(s), as long as the author and OJPHI are acknowledged in the copy and the copy is used for educational, not-for-profit purposes.
Electronic publication date: Day: 4 Month: 4 Year: 2013
collection publication date: Year: 2013
Volume: 5E-location ID: e185
Publisher Id: ojphi-05-185

U.S. Dept. Veterans Affairs (VA) SMEC-bio Reporting for Leadership Decision Support
Shantini D. Gamage*12
Loretta A. Simbartl1
Stephen M. Kralovic123
Katherine S. Wallace4
Gary A. Roselle123
1National Infectious Diseases Service, Veterans Health Administration (VHA), Washington, DC, USA;
2University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA;
3Cincinnati VA Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA;
4Office of Operations, Security and Preparedness (OSP), VA Central Office, Washington, DC, USA
*Shantini D. Gamage, E-mail: shantini.gamage@va.gov

Abstract
Objective

To assess Reports sent from the United States VA Subject Matter Expertise Center for Biological Events (SMEC-bio) – a proof-of-concept decision support initiative – to the VA Integrated Operations Center (VA IOC).

Introduction

VA is the U.S. federal agency responsible for providing services to America’s Veterans. Within VA, VHA is the organization responsible for administration of health care services. VHA, with 152 Medical Centers and over 900 outpatient clinics located throughout the U.S. and territories, provided care to over 5 million patients in 2011.

After the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic, OSP, which oversees VA senior level briefing of preparedness issues, conceptualized and initiated SMEC-bio as a protocol-based mechanism to incorporate timely VHA subject matter expertise into leadership decision making via the VA IOC. Previous work has examined collection and integration of data from VA and interagency sources for trend and predictive analyses (1). This current work is an initial assessment of SMEC-bio reporting, which has been in development for the past year and functions on an ad hoc basis for decision support; needs and gaps can be assessed toward a formalized communication plan with the VA IOC.

Methods

In May, 2011, SMEC-bio designed a Report template. All SMEC-bio Reports submitted to the VA IOC using the template were assessed based on reason for the Report, timing, data sources used, and outcome. A gap analysis was conducted to identify areas for further improvement.

Results

Eight SMEC-bio Reports were produced since the template was initiated in May, 2011. The reasons for reporting fell into the following categories: 1) briefings of interagency protocol activations [e.g. National Biosurveillance Integration System (NBIS) protocol]; 2) Requests for Information (RFIs) from the VA IOC regarding specific biological events (e.g. 2012 H3N2v influenza associated with swine at fairs); 3) RFIs from the VA IOC on general infectious diseases issues (e.g. 2011 dust storm in Arizona); and 4) SMEC-bio-initiated Reports to provide situational awareness to the VA IOC on a biological event (e.g. the measles outbreak at the time of the 2012 Super Bowl in Indiana).

Reports in response to RFIs were all submitted within the day, often within hours including those that required data collection and interpretation, indicating that SMEC-bio can be a viable source for timely decision support to senior leadership. Some Reports, such as the one on possible infectious diseases issues after hurricane Irene in August, 2011, were subsequently shared by VA IOC with VHA Operations and with field facilities, thus highlighting the potential for facilitating provision of timely subject matter expertise for local response.

The primary information source for Reports was the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website, press releases, and interagency briefings. Data sources used were the VHA centrally-administered electronic health records system and syndromic surveillance via VA-adapted ESSENCE.

Gap analysis results included common themes for biopreparedness: uncertainty in data quality and interpretation, communication of results and confidence levels to leadership, and coordination among stakeholders. Furthermore, the development of a decision tool to guide selection of events for reporting will be a critical initial requirement of a formal communications plan.

Conclusions

As SMEC-bio progresses from proof-of-concept phase to development status, knowledge gained from ad hoc reporting, as described in this work, will be critical for developing a routine and effective communications plan. Other ongoing work that will support communications include staffing assessments, development of analysis tools, and incorporating automated report capabilities.


Acknowledgments

The authors thank JC Cantrell, VA IOC Director, and VA IOC staff for helpful interactions regarding reporting.


References
1.. Wallace KS, et al. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Integrated Operations Center (VA IOC): Collaborations for Surveillance, Analysis, and Prediction for Infectious Disease Threat Preparedness — Pilot Review of Dengue OccurrenceEmerg. Health Threats J 4:s155.2011;

Article Categories:
  • ISDS 2012 Conference Abstracts

Keywords: Reporting, Decision Support, Communications.




Online Journal of Public Health Informatics * ISSN 1947-2579 * http://ojphi.org