Does the Internet shape a disciplinary society? The information-knowledge paradox

Authors

  • Indhu Rajagopal York University, Toronto, Canada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i3.4109

Keywords:

Internet, information & Communication Technologies, knowledge, Truth, Ehical Self

Abstract

In the post–modern era, knowledge is being understood as information. In reality, knowledge is commoditized and objectified as decontextualized representations. More information may mean that the society is drawn into a critical phase where loss of knowledge occurs with the unlimited flow of information. Such ubiquitous information could lead to less understanding, less trust and less truth, which would erode rationality in the governance of the society. Using a framework based on Michel Foucault’s archeological methodology, i.e., unearthing how information and communication technologies (ICT) came to be viewed as a source of truth/knowledge, this paper explores the question: Do ICT contribute information that can be construed as knowledge? Does this knowledge contribute to truth or to power? Do ICTs push an information society towards Foucault’s disciplinary society, where the so–called knowledge speaks ‘truth to power’?

Author Biography

Indhu Rajagopal, York University, Toronto, Canada

Professor Department of social science

Downloads

Published

2014-03-06

How to Cite

Rajagopal, I. (2014). Does the Internet shape a disciplinary society? The information-knowledge paradox. First Monday, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i3.4109